Talk:The Gatehouse (charity)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on The Gatehouse. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090207080506/http://www.kennedyrecordings.com:80/conf/nova.htm to http://www.kennedyrecordings.com/conf/nova.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090228023502/http://www.atkinsonfoundation.ca:80/what_we_fund?PROGRAM_ID=9 to http://www.atkinsonfoundation.ca/what_we_fund?PROGRAM_ID=9

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:23, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Undisclosed Paid Editing

This draft contains undisclosed paid edits per Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard#Potentially_an_undisclosed_paid_editor_account; some cleanup may be required. SamHolt6 (talk) 11:59, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

@SamHolt6: I have checked the claims and sourcing, and also added new sources. As I found SIGCOV, I decided to publish.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 15:51, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@ThatMontrealIP: Ok, I have no objections (to the publishing or template removal) now that an experienced editor has preformed a cleanup - it does feel slightly unjust for a charity to be dragged down by the PR firm they may or may not have been connected to. SamHolt6 (talk) 16:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

@SamHolt6: yes that was my thinking too, although one has to wonder who hired the PR Firm! In any case, I figure the four local news articles are enough to meet a minimal notability test. The organization exists, and what they do is being reported on. Thanks.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:02, 1 April 2020 (UTC)