Talk:The Fortnightly Review
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Bill Thayer in topic A different Fortnightly Review
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 18/5/2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in the United Kingdom may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Sorry! edit
Hit intro while writing edit summary.--Technopat (talk) 22:39, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
No citation edit
Removed the claim the 'Fortnightly Review' had been incorporated into the Contemporary Review, since it had no citation, and the Contemporary Review article states its future is 'uncertain as of 2013" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2804:431:C7CA:DD21:5493:8A7C:FB50:69E8 (talk) 14:14, 24 December 2019 (UTC)
A different Fortnightly Review edit
There is a different, and much less well-known, Fortnightly Review: a US Catholic journal published in St. Louis, MO. It ran for at least 40 years; a sample can be found here (among other years and issues) at Archive Org: Vol. XL (1933)