Talk:The Faction Collective
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment: notability
editI think the additional sourcing has pushed this article over the WP:NCORP barrier, but there's still a lot of primary sourcing, mostly in the form of interview-style articles with the company and its skiers. I realise that's partly the nature of the beast, most news coverage of this industry will be similar. However, more reliable secondary sources would be a plus. Ping: Clarazaehe. Cheers, Basie (talk) 10:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment:
editI think that there is a way that the information here may be able to have more diversity in the content. Keeping all the information. It can maybe have user and durable reviews or any studies made on the skies. Since it is a company and product, there should be verifiable reviews on reliable sources. We could also look at the sales and see the popularity of the skis, just some thoughts. Katie Bozzone (talk) 21:39, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Katie Bozzone