Talk:The Exaltation of the Flower/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Maile66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 14:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:  
    Viriditas, please provide sourcing for the Alternate Titles section. — Maile (talk) 14:25, 22 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
    Maile66, task completed. Viriditas (talk) 02:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
    Congratulations! Well done, interesting article. — Maile (talk) 12:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)Reply