Talk:The English Roses/GA1

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Auldhouse (talk · contribs) 02:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I'd be glad to review the English Roses article. --Auldhouse (talk) 02:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Thank you Auldhouse :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 04:38, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   This is a well-written article. I ran it through Grammarly and fixed a few minor copyediting issues. You might want to add a list to the Aftermath and sequels section with a list of the titles of the sequels. --Auldhouse (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

   Pass. Sources are verifiable and no plagarism issues. --Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   The article adheres to the template for {{NovelsWikiProject}} and provides not only a synopsis but information about the publication, literary significance, and reception.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   The article is fair and without bias.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   It would be great to add a photo of Madonna at an event for this book but may be hard to find.--Auldhouse (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Congratulations! This is a well-written, entertaining, and informative article. I remember all the hoopla when this book was first published. I was very pleased to read all of the behind-the-scenes information about the origins of the book. Keep writing!--Auldhouse (talk) 16:15, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Thanks a lot Auldhouse :) —IB ^{[ Poke ]} 16:20, 24 July 2018 (UTC)