Talk:The Dybbuk: An opera in Yiddish

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Voceditenore in topic Copyright problem removed

Article text copyright edit

The text about The Dybbuk on Docuwriting website is written by myself. I owe the copyright for the text and for the docuwriting websit. There is full permition to donated the text in order to create this page on Wikipedia. Thanks for noticing...(Elbow made (talk) 09:50, 8 June 2014 (UTC)).Reply

The Dybbuk: An opera in Yiddish---- Copyright issue edit

I am the composer and librettist of The Dybbuk:An Opera in Yiddish. I hold the copyright to the score and libretto of this opera, and my Copyright is on file with the Copyright Office of the Library of Congress.

I assigned the copyright for the DVD to Rachel Michaeli, who directed the Israel premiere of my opera, and who also directed the video of a live performance. Thus Rachel Michaeli holds the copyright to the PRODUCTION captured on the DVD, which I assigned to her based on her incredibly hard work in implementing the production. I continue to hold the Copyright on the UNDERLYING WORK BEING PRODUCED, but Rachel Michaeli has my full permission to publish, advertise, and promote the opera in any medium, as well as to profit from sales of the DVD.

The statements Rachel Michaeli has transferred from the Docuwriting Website to Wikipedia are entirely correct, and her posting to Wikipedia has my full permission.

I do not understand the technical logistics of navigating online, but if you wish to contact me about this matter, please do so at forza4me@live.com

Thank you for your kind attention to this matter,

Solomon Epstein ----

D.M.A., Hartt School of Music, University of Hartford M.Mus., Yale University School of Music — Preceding unsigned comment added by 161.77.41.44 (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

To Elbow made and Prof Epstein. Unfortunately, we cannot accept previously published text here unless it has been explicitly published under a compatible license, i.e. Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike. We cannot accept the text on the basis of assertions on a talk page that you are the copyright owner and/or have permission from the owner. Please see the section below which explains this further. Voceditenore (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem removed edit

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.docuwriting.com/?page_id=507. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Voceditenore (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Note that even if permission to use the text is eventually received, it will probably require considerable copyediting for a neutral, encyclopedic style and tone. Voceditenore (talk) 15:48, 14 June 2014 (UTC)Reply