Talk:The Dragon and the Doctor/GA1

Latest comment: 3 years ago by Bobamnertiopsis in topic GA review

GA review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Some Dude From North Carolina (talk · contribs) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey, I'm going to be reviewing this article. Expect comments by the end of the week. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:37, 26 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Basic stuff and comments edit

  • Improve the non-free use rationale for the image with this template.
  • That being said, the infobox looks good.
  • Lead summarizes the entire article so no problems there.
  • Plot section looks good as well.
  • Couldn't find any issues in #Writing or #Reception.
  • However, I would add another subsection/header to #References. You can decide which one (see example 1 and example 2).
  • With that in mind, references themselves are in great shape.  

Progress edit

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  
Thanks Some Dude From North Carolina! I've addressed both points; let me know if there's any other work you think this article would benefit from. Kindly —Collint c 17:03, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Bobamnertiopsis: The non-free use rationale was not improved. You can simply do this by copy-and-pasting the template and filling in several key parameters including the article, use, author, and source. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 17:27, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Some Dude From North Carolina: Aha, I understand now. Added! —Collint c 17:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)Reply