Talk:The Disclosure Project NPC Conference

Reliable sources for notability

Is the deletion of the {{notability}} tag without any comment to be understood that no reliable sources explaining notability will be forthcoming? Weregerbil 14:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

No, its means i dispute the article being proded.--Striver 15:18, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Oh, it wasnt a prod? Sorry then. Regarding notability, isnt Sara McClendon enough? --Striver 15:19, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

I don't think everything that Sara McClendon does is automatically encyclopedic. If the event was encyclopedically notable surely there are some reliable sources that covered it? Weregerbil 15:24, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

The topic is new to me, i stumbled on it today. Im trying to make some google searches for some national newspapers... Try watching the video. --Striver 15:27, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Just found this. That should be enough. --Striver 15:28, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

<- shift left

Allright! That's what I'm talking about! Now for an article that is sourced from those reliable sources in a neutral way (as opposed to what the self-published sources say). As of now the article makes fairly few statements; the "largest meeting" and the attendee list are pretty much the only ones that could be sourced. Although "largest meeting" may need to qualified with e.g. "...until then", because the sources from 2001 can't of course verify that there hasn't been a larger meeting after that. Weregerbil 15:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Bro, this is not my area, i just started the article since it seemed intresting and notable. I asked for some support, and i hope it will come. --Striver 15:47, 10 August 2006 (UTC)