Talk:The Death of Eric Cartman

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 194.81.254.231 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

I think there should be a mention that the title is a reference to the beavis and butthead episode "beavis and butthead are dead"

I think that there shouldn't be, unless you can cite it.Alastairward (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
It doesn't sound like a reference to that, to be honest. In any case, that title itself was a reference to the line "Rosencrantz and Gildenstern are dead" in Hamlet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.81.254.231 (talk) 19:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Coincidence? edit

I don't think there is any proof of this, but I find this episode to be a parody of "Ghost Whisperer" and "My Name Is Earl"... If only these shows existed at the time this episode originally aired!!!! All of the plot is suspiciously similar to those two shows, that, I repeat, weren't aired at the time of this South Park episode. It seems very weird to me. Is there any reference to this, or was it just coincidence? Is this episode based on any other similar shows? --212.183.217.154 18:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Cannibal remark. Need a verification edit

On the bus stop Cartman makes a remark about a chick on the news that had her left tittie cut off. It may refer to the German cannibal that cut off his girlfriend's left breast, cooked and ate it 2005. I am not from the USA and there miight have been some other similar cases in the USA I know nothing about. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ptasiek83 (talkcontribs) 20:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC).Reply

Another movie edit

There are also references to a movie "Ghost".

Cite? Alastairward (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Errors edit

I think the errors on the page should stick, because Cartman only tore a strip of skin down one side of each piece. Also, there were only about half a dozen pieces of chicken on his plate, whereas there were more in the box when the boys opened it. Also, Cartman believes he's a ghost, but still seems to be able to record a song and not be convinced he isn't.

Cultural References edit

Cite or they remain here;

Alastairward (talk) 11:47, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply