Talk:The Death of Captain Marvel

Latest comment: 1 day ago by BennyOnTheLoose in topic GA Review

Feedback from New Page Review process edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:40, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Death of Captain Marvel/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 18:54, 12 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: BennyOnTheLoose (talk · contribs) 22:44, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Rate Attribute Review Comment
1. Well-written:
  1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
  1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check:
  2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
  2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
  2c. it contains no original research.
  2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. I reviewed the top matches found using Earwig's Copyvio Detector. No concerns. Matches are titles, names, or phrases acceptable per WP:LIMITED such as "The arrival of Drax the Destroyer" and "Mar-Vell breaks the news to"
3. Broad in its coverage:
  3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
  3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
  6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. FUR for the cover image. Starlin image is CC and the Ars moriendi image is CC.
  6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
  7. Overall assessment.


Plot summary

  • Optionally, consider varying the start of paras (Mar-Vell records/Mar-Vell records/Mar-Vell asks)
  • I was wondering whether it would be helpful to have brief intros to Thanos, Yon-Rogg, etc in the text, but that might make it awkward to read. I suppose that most readers will assume correctly the type of characters that are mentioned.
  • Is it worth adding something about what nega-bands are?

Creation

  • The link for Critical Survey of Graphic Novels: Heroes & Superheroes is to Vol 2, but I think the relevant article is in Vol 1.

Themes

Reception and legacy

Lead