Talk:The Cost of Living (Lost)/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by 23W in topic GA Review

GA Review edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: 23W (talk · contribs) 04:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (reference section):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
  • Some sentences require footnotes following a direct quotation, per WP:MINREF.
  • The air date should be mentioned somewhere in the reception section, preferably with a reliable source.

Other than that, this looks pretty good; on hold. Quite a few books on the series discuss this episode, so I hope you'll be able to include these if you ever take this to FAC. 23W 04:12, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Added the airdate and some extra refs. igordebraga 04:21, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

  • Looks good: I'll give this a pass. This would make for a good DYK entry, particularly about the Jackass Ginger set. 23W 04:58, 21 July 2014 (UTC)Reply