Talk:The Cornell Review

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

New York (state): Cornell University Low‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state) articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cornell University, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Conservatism Low‑importance

	Conservatism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Politics: Libertarianism Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

However, the new publication had minimal impact on campus until 2004, when it began to make gains against the Review.

What does this mean? We're talking about a student publication here. How does one measure "making gains"? --Deville (Talk) 06:14, 5 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Diversity edit

Latest comment: 18 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Where on the masthead does it say the 1997 staff of the Review was ethnically diverse? JDoorj a m Talk 19:43, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

From the article:

The editors, several of whom were members of racial minorities although none African-American, defended the editorial as satire and criticized the burning as suppression of free speech, winning some publicity in conservative circles[citation needed].

Well, if it's just several people we are talking about, why not just say, "...several of whom were Vietnamese-American" etc? Then we would not need this strange "although non African-American" disclaimer. In addition, let's consider why there is a statement about the racial makeup of the editors to begin with. If there's any substantial reason why that should be mentioned for NPOV reasons, then being more precise should not hurt. But it seems to me that a more precise statement like, "one editor was Vietnamese-American, another was a Chinese-American" or whatever, adds incredibly little. It's ridiculous really. I'm puzzled why such a statement was even added, unless perhaps, it was added, as typically is the case, as a kind of defensive gesture. --C S (Talk) 20:56, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've removed the statement, per Chan-Ho. JDoorj a m Talk 15:09, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ownership edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The paper is published by an independent corporation registered in Ithaca called Ithaca Review, Inc; you'll usually find the names of the board of directors, mostly Review alumni, on the masthead. It is a longtime member of Collegiate Network, which is currently administered by ISI, but not "owned" in any sense by either. -choster 19:00, 26 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on The Cornell Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20041216103349/http://www.villagevoice.com:80/issues/9739/hentoff.php to http://www.villagevoice.com/issues/9739/hentoff.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:57, 8 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on The Cornell Review. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic