The Converted Deacon has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 29, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Converted Deacon/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 15:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I'll another one again if you don't mind! JAGUAR 15:30, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against GA criteria
edit- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- I would recommend cutting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
- Why is "Independent" capitalised in the lead?
- "Though the reviewer in the The New York Dramatic Mirror however disagreed that the premise was plausible" - I would cut "however" and add a semi-colon at the end before the quote
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
A solid and well researched article with no major problems that would make this to be put on hold. JAGUAR 17:20, 29 May 2015 (UTC)