Talk:The Churchill Factor

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

United Kingdom

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Balance edit

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The reviews we include say it is a naff history book written in a self-serving way to promote Johnson. This might be the consensus view of academia and journalists, though if it's not, then we're lacking balance. Solipsism 101 (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

The Times is more complimentary.[1] Solipsism 101 (talk) 15:35, 7 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic