Talk:The Care Bears Movie/GA2

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Reviewer: Sjones23 (talk • message • contribs • count • logs • email) 01:07, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Everything in this article looks pretty much good to go, especially in the lead, plot, release, production and reception sections. Keep up the good work, Darth Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 01:14, 3 September 2011 (UTC)