Talk:The Bryce Report
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Untitled
editOnce again, critics to the commission are "few" and the response to the critics are "vast". Wikipedia is truly suffering a grave problem to balance out what new folks are writing with old writers. Basically wikipedia is tending to see reliable sources on "new" writers. Most needed in this article is to balance the critics to the commission with the response topic, since, as it is now, breaks any neutrality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.119.210.47 (talk) 22:17, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
the work by a. ponsonby is NOT a novel —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.129.149.149 (talk) 12:48, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Merge with Committee on Alleged German Outrages
editThis page and the above-mentioned describe the same subject. Both have useful information so propose merging this into the other, as "Committee on Alleged German Outrages" is the correct name for the report, but can indicate in page that it is known as The Bryce Commission. Johnhousefriday (talk) 05:06, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
- Done, but the result needs some work I think. Salmanazar (talk) 10:21, 27 December 2008 (UTC)