Talk:The Boys Are Back (The Oak Ridge Boys album)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Novice7 | Talk 03:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   It's fine.

   B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:

   Example:- The lead should summarize the whole article's content. Use of "#" is not encouraged.

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Only 5 sources. The main source is dead too.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Some contents seem like OR.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Some sentences seem biased.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   The performance photograph could use a bit more description.

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   I'm sorry. This is not definitely GA material. If you feel this is an error, you can ask for reassessment.