Talk:The Book of Daniel (album)
Latest comment: 5 years ago by Jonesey95 in topic Edit warring
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 15-10-2018 by Binksternet. |
release date edit
I see that the release date is in the past, but as far as I can tell it is not released. Maybe it should be replaced with "TBD" or similar? Franknarf11 (talk) 22:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Bad writing (lack of actual sourcing, lack of neutrality, and poor formatting) edit
There has been a great deal of obviously self-aggrandizing, poorly formatted, and unsourced content on the article. My last revision (revision 852110710) was an attempt to rectify this, but someone got mad because I reverted someone else's reversion a couple of times. Hopefully someone who still remembers this article exists (that isn't Danny or a fan) can vouch for me here. 75.102.250.54 (talk) 19:07, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
- Your WP:ALLEGED violations and similar do not help. I will alert the WP:BLP noticeboard, WP:Neutral noticeboard and WP:Christianity to this matter. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 04:51, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- "Oh, they fixed the manual of style almost completely, removed poorly sourced or unsourced content, and updated the information, but they used "alleged" a couple of times, so let's throw the baby out with the bathwater because I want an excuse to push someone out of the community and protect a clearly horribly written and non-neutral page." 107.77.209.90 (talk) 15:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Stalking with nonsense, I see. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you're gonna deny what I'm saying, the least you could do is respond coherently. 75.102.250.19 (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is no denial. There is you not paying attention and responding with bitter nonsense. And IP-hopping. The key to a poorly written and/or biased article is not to add even more poor and biased wording. One registered editor so far has worked on the article since I responded above and reported. Getting help on this matter was the appropriate response per the WP:Edit warring and biased wording. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Replacing self-aggrandizing information with neutral information that's more reflective of current information provided is not "bitter nonsense." Using my phone ≠ "IP-hopping." And if you think removing stuff that was literally made up(almost as if... wait for it... it came directly from a primary source? wow, crazy, huh?) is biased and that fixing bizarre formatting is "poorly written and biased," then I dunno what to tell you, big man. All I'm saying is I think this project would go much smoother if you dropped that arrogant and presumptuous attitude and actually heard what people are saying, das all. 75.102.250.19 (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sighs. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 08:22, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Replacing self-aggrandizing information with neutral information that's more reflective of current information provided is not "bitter nonsense." Using my phone ≠ "IP-hopping." And if you think removing stuff that was literally made up(almost as if... wait for it... it came directly from a primary source? wow, crazy, huh?) is biased and that fixing bizarre formatting is "poorly written and biased," then I dunno what to tell you, big man. All I'm saying is I think this project would go much smoother if you dropped that arrogant and presumptuous attitude and actually heard what people are saying, das all. 75.102.250.19 (talk) 14:08, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- There is no denial. There is you not paying attention and responding with bitter nonsense. And IP-hopping. The key to a poorly written and/or biased article is not to add even more poor and biased wording. One registered editor so far has worked on the article since I responded above and reported. Getting help on this matter was the appropriate response per the WP:Edit warring and biased wording. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:41, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- If you're gonna deny what I'm saying, the least you could do is respond coherently. 75.102.250.19 (talk) 01:45, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
- Stalking with nonsense, I see. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 07:28, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
- "Oh, they fixed the manual of style almost completely, removed poorly sourced or unsourced content, and updated the information, but they used "alleged" a couple of times, so let's throw the baby out with the bathwater because I want an excuse to push someone out of the community and protect a clearly horribly written and non-neutral page." 107.77.209.90 (talk) 15:24, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
- Regarding this, I take it that Steam Heat is you. Obviously. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 14:03, 6 August 2018 (UTC)
Edit warring edit
Edit warring reported. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 17:05, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have semi-protected this article for a week. However, if I see any named accounts engaging in clear and obvious edit-warring, they can expect a block. I can't believe the amount of disruption that's gone on here. Is it really worth all this large scale reverting and shouting at each other? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 00:08, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- Steam Heat was WP:CheckUser-blocked by NinjaRobotPirate. And since the latest semi-protection has lifted, the other editor has re-added what Steam Heat removed. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:29, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ponyo did the block, actually. I just revoked Steam Heat's talk page access. I'm not too familiar with this situation, but let me know if there's something I can do to help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
- NinjaRobotPirate, thanks to Ponyo then. And, Ritchie333, the two are back at it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Nobody's touched the article for three days. If IPs start warring again, ping me and I'll re-protect. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, NinjaRobotPirate and Ponyo, like I stated at the WP:Edit warring noticeboard, it's a slow edit war with no end in sight. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Right, semi'd for a month. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 20:03, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Ritchie333, NinjaRobotPirate and Ponyo, like I stated at the WP:Edit warring noticeboard, it's a slow edit war with no end in sight. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 19:34, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
- Nobody's touched the article for three days. If IPs start warring again, ping me and I'll re-protect. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:33, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
- NinjaRobotPirate, thanks to Ponyo then. And, Ritchie333, the two are back at it. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 05:10, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
- Ponyo did the block, actually. I just revoked Steam Heat's talk page access. I'm not too familiar with this situation, but let me know if there's something I can do to help. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:42, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Jonesey95, see above. It's just the usual edit warring. It will go on forever, it seems. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 10:35, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I don't really care about the content, I just don't want editors to re-introduce broken syntax. I'm just a gnome with an error-tracking category as a hammer, so everything looks like a nail. – Jonesey95 (talk) 11:06, 14 October 2018 (UTC)
Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page have been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 20:52, 27 August 2018 (UTC)