This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have done some editing of the article and brought back the vocabulary section. Initially because of length warnings I broken this out into a separate article. This separate article was marked for moving to Wiktionary. I think these definitions belong on the page about this novel because many of them appear in a way that seems to be very context-sensitive. Paul R. Potts 21:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I disagree. It would extend the length of articles on all older books to do this, and lead to intolerable duplication. Wiktionary is where we go for the meanings of words. Kenilworth Terrace (talk) 17:14, 10 August 2010 (UTC)Reply
