Talk:The Black Cherry Bombshells

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Tenebrae in topic Edits of January 3

Copyright violation edit

The plot was (correctly) flagged as copyright violation [1] so I've removed it as well as formatting the page [2]. Feel free to add your own plot synopsis but copying and pasting from another site would just get this article deleted (quickly) and I'd rather we didn't go down that road. (Emperor (talk) 14:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC))Reply

I've had to remove the text again [3] please don't add it again. (Emperor (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2008 (UTC))Reply

And again edit

I've just had to remove copyvio material again, plus the blatantly promotional edits by one of the comics' creators, Tony Trov, which violates WP:COI ten ways to Tuesday.

I've synthesized and consolidated the information to what I think is the basic, neutral, non-promotional gist of things, and cut down the plethora of promotional links to the handful that Wikipedia guidelines state for "External links."

I will post a notice on Trov's talk page, asking him to please desist. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edits of January 3 edit

The people involved with Zuda continually attempt to use Wikipedia as a promotional vehicle, and here, as in The Black Cherry Bombshells and elsewhere, refuse to use the consensus-derived WikiProject Comics formatting, use solicitation-style blurbs rather than neutral-tone synopses, and generally write in a hype-y, non-encyclopedic tone. If this were newbie mistakes, that would be one thing. But they continually revert the work of responsible editors and engage in conflict-of-interest behavior, often through anonymous IPs, that has no place in an encyclopedia.

No one involved in Zuda should be editing Zuda articles. Anyone editing Wikipedia should be versed in the policies and guidelines that are given an overview in the Five Pillars of Wikipedia.

Please refrain from all promotional, non-encyclopedic edits. This is a matter than can warrant administrator intervention, the locking of articles, and blocks or bans of those engaging in what is considered, after these detailed warnings, vandalism. --Tenebrae (talk) 15:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply