This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Fair use rationale for Image:Betaband eponymous.jpg
editImage:Betaband eponymous.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:38, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Structure
edit"Jim Steinman ... wasn't too pleased at first and insisted that the band re-record it without the samples, but he soon had a change of heart and the track went ahead" - sorry, but that reads like something from a fanzine. Could someone who has some kind of citeable source for this please incorporate it while rewording the whole paragraph so it comes across as something a little less, I dunno, chatty? Dom Kaos (talk) 19:43, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
- No other comments, so I'm deleting that section for the moment. If anyone wants to have a go at re-writing it and adding it back in, go for it! Dom Kaos (talk) 11:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)