This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Podcasting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of notable podcasts and podcast-related information on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PodcastingWikipedia:WikiProject PodcastingTemplate:WikiProject Podcastingpodcasting articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This redirect is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is not spam. It is a legitimate article on a legitimate podcast and TV series with multiple references from reliable sources. Otto4711 (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
What exactly is your problem with this article? What specifically is not neutral about it? Otto4711 (talk) 20:59, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have removed the NPOV tag as there has been nothing offered to substantiate its being placed on the article. Otto4711 (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
First of all, if you are associated with the here! network, you should really avoid editing articles about your content, per WP:COI. Second, the changes you are making are unsourced, thus failing WP:V and must be removed. If you want the information included in the article, try issuing a press release and then an independent editor can incorporate it. Your claim of association with the network is insufficient to allow for the changes you are making. The logo is acceptable fair use under the copyright laws of the United States. Otto4711 (talk) 16:28, 22 July 2008 (UTC)Reply
