Talk:The Bart Wants What It Wants/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 20:52, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• There is one deadlink

More to come Ruby2010 comment! 21:20, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

• Wikilink Rainier Wolfcastle in lead
• You can remove Canada in the lead (I think most readers know where Toronto is; wikilink the city for those less informed) ;)
• Wikilink characters in polt (Homer etc)
• The plot seems a little disconnected (why did Homer steal the Olympic torch?) The section could use some expansion (it's still below the basic word limits)
• "even though it Canada is not mentioned"
• "features the Simpsons first travel to Canada" -> the Simpsons'
• "It was written by Frink and, according to Selman, the line became very popular with the staff..." I think you should change the first "It" to "the line" and change second "the line" to "it"
• Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations
• Refs 2 and 10: page number?
• Remove caps on ref 8

On hold for seven days. Thanks, Ruby2010 comment! 21:53, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for the review! Queenieacoustic (talk) 10:28, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Looks good except: Refs 2 and 10: page number? Ruby2010 comment! 16:25, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

The refs were added by another editor. I've asked him if he could provide with the page numbers, but he hasn't responded yet, so there's really nothing I can do for now unfortunately. Queenieacoustic (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

User:Scorpion0422 likely didn't include the page numbers because they weren't available. Page numbers are not always available on Newsbank. And besides, page numbers are optional per Wikipedia:Citing sources. Theleftorium ^(talk) 23:00, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Well, I'm satisfied then. Pass for GA. Nice work, Ruby2010 comment! 03:06, 3 August 2011 (UTC)