Talk:The Art of Dreaming

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

edit

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

i would like to know if anyone out there has actually had any success trying this.

yup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.145.149 (talk) 07:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Removed link to external commercial website from "See Also" section. This section should be reserved for wiki entries. At best, the commercial site may be used in references if it is used for source material in the article; otherwise it counts as blatant misuse of editing privileges for personal gain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.65.212 (talk) 03:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

The article is discussing the Art of Dreaming as a process, not the book. Perhaps a disambiguation page is needed. (````) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nortonmansfield (talk • contribs) 04:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

Non-fiction? edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article starts off "The Art of Dreaming is a non-fictional book". I think there is not a scintilla of evidence that the book recounts actual events. In any event, the sentence is controversial, and requires evidence and the support of reliable independent references. Surely the editors knew that, in the opinion of skeptics, the whole range of Castenada books are fiction? Macdonald-ross (talk) 20:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic