Talk:The American Economist

This article was nominated for deletion on 25 April 2019. The result of the discussion was redirect.

	This redirect was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This redirect was accepted from this draft on 25 April 2019 by reviewer Barkeep49 (talk · contribs).

Academic Journals

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Academic Journals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Academic Journals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Academic JournalsWikipedia:WikiProject Academic JournalsTemplate:WikiProject Academic JournalsAcademic Journal articles
See WikiProject Academic Journals' writing guide for tips on how to improve this article.

objection to deletion edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article was suggested for potential deletion and the reasoning being that it is a non-notable journal. However, it more than satisfies the "notability" criteria for academic journals. 23 different Nobel Prize winners have published 29 articles in the journal over the years. The list includes very famous economists such as Milton Friedman and Paul Samuelson. Furthermore, the journal is indexed and archived by JSTOR, the premier and highly selective repository of leading journal backfiles across all major academic fields. The journal is also indexed and cataloged through many readily available bibliographic services including EBSCO, and more importantly for an economics journal, ECONLIT. I will make edits to the page indicating these facts and providing proper references. It is indisputable that JSTOR is HIGHLY SELECTIVE. Only the most important journals in any field are invited to be archived. From the JSTOR website itself: "JSTOR is a highly selective digital library of academic content in many formats and disciplines. The collections include top peer-reviewed scholarly journals as well as respected literary journals, academic monographs, research reports from trusted institutes, and primary sources." (https://about.jstor.org/whats-in-jstor/) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagemcgowan (talk • contribs)

Of course, any database will say about itself mostly laudatory stuff. No database is going to say "we include any crap we can find". JSTOR is not crap, but it is not generally regarded as selective in the sense of NJournals and inclusion in it does not contribute to notability. --Randykitty (talk) 21:37, 25 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

From the City University of New York Graduate Center Library: "Not every journal will be in JSTOR, and most never will be." https://gclibrary.commons.gc.cuny.edu/2013/10/28/jstor-not-the-only-game-in-town/

From the New York Public Library: "JSTOR A searchable, digitized archive -- from the first date of publication to the last three to five years -- of major scholarly journals in many academic fields." https://www.nypl.org/collections/articles-databases/jstor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagemcgowan (talk • contribs) 16:38, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

From Cambridge University: "JSTOR is a high-quality, interdisciplinary archive of scholarship that includes leading academic journals across the arts, humanities, social sciences and sciences." https://www.alumni.cam.ac.uk/benefits/journals-and-online-resources/jstor — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pagemcgowan (talk • contribs) 16:44, 26 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic