Talk:The Alternative (Denmark)

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Denmark Mid‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics articles

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Edit war edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

There seems to be an edit war going on. This article needs more info on the objectives of the party and its role in Danish politics - incl. the social movement element. So it is to rewrite info about this than simply reverting.--Batmacumba (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

It's not an "edit war", someone simply is trying to use a first-party source (the political party's own website) poorly translated into English to create an uncritical, advertorial sort of article, which is not suitable for an encyclopaedia. Wikipedia don't need the party statutes and marketing copy-and-pasted here in poor quality English. Remember, this is a relatively small Green party which hasn't existed for long, and there is not may English language sources about the party yet. As for the 'social movement' issue, that appears to only be something the political party markets itself as being, which is a common practice (e.g. the Five Star Movement in Italy), but doesn't mean that the organisation isn't a political party in either the de facto or de jure sense.--Autospark (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Add topic