This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Discrimination, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Discrimination on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DiscriminationWikipedia:WikiProject DiscriminationTemplate:WikiProject DiscriminationDiscrimination articles
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times, and has specific typeface formatting requirements. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site.
Latest comment: 8 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Hi. Citation styles and article titles are somewhat distinct. If you all insist on using Bluebook for citations, that's probably fine on a per-article basis. But for article titles, Wikipedia:Article titles is the relevant policy. It seems pretty clear that "Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc." is more common than "Texas Dept. of Hous. and Cmty. Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc."
There are also general prohibitions against using abbreviations in page titles, with some exceptions for acronyms such as NASA and middle initials such as Harry S. Truman. In this case, the reliable sources and general practice dictate not using obscure abbreviations such as "Cmty." in the article title. --MZMcBride (talk) 16:18, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
MZMcBride, thanks for taking the initiative on the page move, and thank you for the thoughtful explanation. When I originally created this article, I used the title "Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc." notwithstanding the fact that some words were not abbreviated per T6 in the Bluebook. I agree that we should generally use titles that are cited by reliable sources, rather than a perfunctory application of Bluebook abbreviations. However, for SCOTUS articles, I think we should follow the abbreviated title that appears on the slip opinion or the abbreviated title that appears in the U.S. Reports. For example, the title of National Assn. of Home Builders v. Defenders of Wildlife is abbreviated in a manner that reflects the abbreviations in the U.S. reports (see 551 U.S. 644), even though "National" should be abbreviated "Nat'l" pursuant to T6. That said, how do you feel about moving the article back to the original title of "Texas Dept. of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc." to reflect the abbreviations that appear on the slip opinion? Best, -- Notecardforfree (talk) 17:11, 11 December 2015 (UTC)Reply
