Talk:Tetracarpaea

Latest comment: 14 years ago by 128.171.106.205 in topic Do not move

More to write

edit

Notes: I have much more to write. I would like to come back and finish it later. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.171.106.253 (talkcontribs)

You've made a very good start! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:35, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Move?

edit

As this genus is the only member of the Tetracarpaeaceae family, shouldn't it be moved to the family's title instead of the genus? Smartse (talk) 17:04, 1 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Do not move

edit

In the section on naming plant articles, WikiProject Plants has adopted the convention that monogeneric families should be covered under the name of the single genus that they contain. It seems easier to do it this way for reasons that are, admittedly, more psychological than logical. For example, the genus name is shorter. Also, only one family name can be derived from a genus name, but given a family name there are usually several possible genus names that it could have been derived from. 128.171.106.205 (talk) 01:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)Reply