The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Popular Culture, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Popular CultureWikipedia:WikiProject Popular CultureTemplate:WikiProject Popular CulturePopular Culture articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
If anyone thinks this article is not ready for the mainspace or otherwise not a proper article, use AFD. Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests is not a proper forum to have an article you don't like Draftified. No discussion is needed to create a spinoff article. Technical requests are concerning page moves not content. ‡ El cid, el campeadortalk 15:10, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
This was originally created as a temporary talk-page draft to work on the content. Apparently nobody took it up and instead of fixing this, someone just lazily moved it into mainspace. That is not appropriate; particularly when this is so obviously excessively detailed. Wikipedia is not a newspaper, we have no reason to have anything remotely resembling this shown to our readers. Patience and dedication are more useful here than needlessly moving something which is clearly not ready for mainspace. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:43, 13 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Well, I see you are actually taking the time to fix the article, so I commend you. ‡ El cid, el campeadortalk 12:41, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Just wanted to chime in to say that despite the fact I moved this, I agree that RM/TR was the wrong venue. I only moved it because I saw three editors agreeing and that seemed enough to do something regardless of venue. Glad to see it's being improved, that's what I was hoping for, clearly a lot of work went into this. ASUKITE 13:46, 14 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
I've been trying to do some condensing in my sandbox, not bold enough to just copy-paste it here, but please take a look: here. I've essentially tried to cut down on detail as much as possible, and organised the text so that the plaintiff/defendant's testimony comes first, then the other witnesses, and then expert witnesses. Let me know what you think! TrueHeartSusie3 (talk) 21:04, 17 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think losing the strength of a chronological presentation of the content as developed would be a backward step. I also like the navigability available currently as similar to that in the Trial of Michael Jackson article. The editorial input we give the better. The content speaks for itself. Additions of who's who guide/s to supplement the content might work though. GregKaye 19:54, 19 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
I think that the sandbox arrangement is fine, but I have not reviewed the trimming in detail. starship.paint (exalt) 08:27, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Just a note that the sandbox is missing stuff on Bryan Neumeister [2], Beverly Leonard and Julian Ackert. I won't have time to add all three. starship.paint (exalt) 08:36, 26 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
