Talk:Tervel of Bulgaria

Untitled

Do we know what territories the kingdom of Tervel consisted of?

"Saviour of Europe"

I am removing the relevant section, that claims "After the Bulgarian army crushed the Arabs during the siege of Constantinople (718) Tervel was called by contemporaries the Saviour of Europe." First, "Europe" as a concept did not exist back then. Second, while working on rewriting Siege of Constantinople (717–718), I went through most Greek and all Arab sources, and there is none actually mentioning him in these words. While Tervel contributed in an event that (from a modern Western view) "saved Europe", the statement, as it has long stood in this and the siege article is plainly wrong. Of the sources used as references, one was a Wikipedia mirror, two were not WP:RS. The only one that seems relatively reliable mentions nothing about contemporaries, but only far later accounts (Blasius Kleiner and Paisius of Hilandar). Constantine ✍ 16:41, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

• The name Saviour of Europe is invented later by Western historians. Arab chroniclers of the period, and Zigebert claim that Bulgarian Army played a major role in the defeat of the Arabs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.118.193.187 (talk) 12:32, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

User:Христо Зарев Игнатов aka User:213.91.244.2, your sources are unscientific. As explained above, Tervel was never called a "saviour of Europe" by any contemporary, this is a later term most likely invented by modern Bulgarian historiography. Let's not get too dramatic about the "historical past of Bulgarian people" by trying to reinvent it. Also, please be aware that using an account and an IP Wikipedia:Sockpuppet is still Wikipedia:Edit warring and will get you banned. I will now revert your changes back to the previous version and if you continue with your edit warring, I will report you for violating the three-revert rule.. — Toдor Boжinov — 16:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC)

• Dear Todor, please, define "scientific". regards! --213.91.244.2 (talk) 17:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tervel of Bulgaria. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090501180254/http://istoria-vuz.hit.bg/tervel.html to http://istoria-vuz.hit.bg/tervel.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822030021/http://www.bulgaria.com/history/rulers/tarvel.html to http://www.bulgaria.com/history/rulers/tarvel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:19, 9 December 2017 (UTC)