Talk:Terminus (god)

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Inqilābī in topic Pronunciation
Good articleTerminus (god) has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 16, 2007Good article nomineeListed
July 14, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

Typo

edit

Is terminalus a typo for terminalis? In Latin the -al- adjectival suffix is typically 3rd declension (two-termination).

I wonder if it would be worthwhile to quote or link to the description of the Terminalia in Ovid's Fasti? --Fulminouscherub 21:13, 27 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Translation of concedo nulli?

edit

Is the translation correct? I take it to mean, "I yield to none." The translation on the page suggests it's some archaic imperative and a dative of reference or something like that. If this is the case, is there an inscription it was taken from?Hariboa (talk) 13:48, 23 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fasti

edit

It would be worthwhile to include the information from the Fasti. Additionally, a theory has been proposed by Dr. Samuel Husky that Turnus's death in the Aeneid is justifiable in light of the fact that he moved a boundary stone when he lifted and hurled that boulder at Aeneas shortly before his death. According to Roman law, any person who had committed such an offense against the god could be put to death by any citizen. Just a thought. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.15.127.254 (talkcontribs) 00:32, 17 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Passed GA

edit

A well-written, well-referenced, informative article. Perhaps it could be improved by an image of a bust or statue and (if appropriate) a myth/legend regarding Terminus. ck lostsword|queta!|Suggestions? 22:50, 22 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:Terminus (god)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

GA Sweeps: Kept

edit

As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing Sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I went through the article and made various changes, please look them over. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good Article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talkcontrib) 05:58, 15 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 11 June 2021

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Withdrawn by nom. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 23:58, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply


– The god is the primary topic by longterm significance. Everything on the disambiguation page, if not a partial disambiguation, has a name based on the god - or at least the word based on the name of the god. (Since WP:NOTDICTIONARY, it would not make sense to have an article on the word.) ZXCVBNM (TALK) 03:27, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Jupiter

edit

William Smith regards Terminus as an aspect of Jupiter. He posits that this explains why there was a Terminus stone in the temple and he questions the traditional story of the augury &c. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 00:30, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Erasmus image

edit

I think the Erasmus image is given too much prominence in the article. The Romans left us oodles of boundary markers, but they aren't humanoid. The Capitoline cult object was probably a sacred stone of some sort (see e.g. A Topographical Dictionary of Ancient Rome by Samuel Ball Platner and Thomas Ashby or Notes on the Eighth Book of the Commentary of Servius on Vergil's Aeneid by Edna Wiegand, or the classical sources they cite like Serv. A. 9.446), not a statue. The only possible Roman source I've that isn't clearly based on the Greek hermae is this coin:

  Actual coins: [1] [2] [3] [4]

It was minted on order of the son of Marcus Pupius Piso Frugi Calpurnianus. At first sight it looks less of a conventional herma than this coin: [5] But Celestino Cavedoni argues it's an image of Mercury just like the coin's twin, which features the god's face, although I must say I'm not quite 100% convinced by his reasoning and others did think it might represent Terminus. But then again, if there are no other humanoid representations of a Roman Terminus, then doesn't that make the Mercury hypothesis more likely?

As for the origin of Erasmus's Terminus, it came from a gem that an early 16th century Italian antiquarian had identified as being an image of Terminus, but according to John Rowlands it is nowadays thought to represent a herma of Dionysos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.61.180.106 (talk) 03:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

Pronunciation

edit

In English, is it a homophone of the word terminus? ·~ dictátor·mundꟾ 11:53, 11 March 2022 (UTC)Reply