Talk:Terminal value (finance)

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Accounting task force.

Finance & Investment Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Definition of Enterprise value? edit

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The definition of Enterprise value in this article and in the article about Enterprise value don't seem to correspond. Why? At least one of the articles must clearly be adjusted. The question is only which one and how. --Smallchanges 15:50, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Perpetuity Growth Model edit

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Somehow it doesn't make sense to me that "g" would be subtracted from "k" in the Perpetuity Growth Model. It seems much more natural to simply divide the cash flow with "(1+k/100)^n" to get the present value of a future cash flow. Or am I missing something? --Smallchanges 16:13, 1 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The perpetuity growth model is consistent with most texts on the subject. Mathmatically this formula is incorrect however. For a stable growth rate business, the equation is correctly stated at CFn/(((1+k)/(1+g))-1) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.74.20.14 (talk) 15:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic