Talk:Terminal Aérea metro station

Latest comment: 3 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
Former good article nomineeTerminal Aérea metro station was a Engineering and technology good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 4, 2020Good article nomineeNot listed

External links modified (January 2018) edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Metro Terminal Aérea. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:25, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
Nomination failed (withdrawn)

This review is transcluded from Talk:Metro Terminal Aérea/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Username6892 (talk · contribs) 16:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm Username6892, and I will be reviewing this article. I may give some comments before completing the review. Username6892 16:10, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose ( ) 1b. MoS ( ) 2a. ref layout ( ) 2b. cites WP:RS ( ) 2c. no WP:OR ( ) 2d. no WP:CV ( )
3a. broadness ( ) 3b. focus ( ) 4. neutral ( ) 5. stable ( ) 6a. free or tagged images ( ) 6b. pics relevant ( )
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked   are unassessed

Location edit

  • On their Policy Review of Mexico, OECD criticized the location for not being tourist-friendly.[6] On the page number given, the criticism is about the station design and lack of information rather than the location. (2c)
  • Reworded.
  • It also serves colonias Peñón de los Baños and Moctezuma 2ª sección Is there an English translation for this? (1a)
  • I can change colonia to neighborhood (with a link to colonia), but in the strict sense, I can't translate proper names. While "Moctezuma Second Section" might be understandable "Crag of the Bathrooms" is not. © Tbhotch (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
      • If it is just a proper name it should be fine Username6892 18:49, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Station layout edit

  • Not cited (2c)
  • Removed

History and construction edit

Between Oceanía–Terminal Aérea stretch, the track goes from surface to underground,[10] ref 10 says that it's between Terminal Aerea and Hangares (2c), also, change it to "Between Oceanía (or Hangares because that's what the source says) and Terminal Aérea, the track runs from the surface to an underground tunnel" (1a)

  • Source 10 says: "En el tramo Oceanía-Puerto Aéreo se localiza la transición de vía superficial o en tajo a subterránea, y a ese nivel quedan las estaciones Terminal Aérea y Hangares, así como el tramo que las une, cuya estructura fue construida con el sistema de muros Milán." Transliterally it says "In the Oceanía-Puerto Aéreo--the avenue--stretch the ground-level to underground transition is located, and at that level--it refers to underground--Terminal Aérea and Hangares stations are located, like the stretch that connects them, whose structure of diaphragm wall was built by the Milan method".--I could add this last part I forgot. © Tbhotch (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
    • I'm getting confused by this. Perhaps I need a 2nd opinion. Username6892 19:00, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply

Landmarks edit

  • Four murals, titled Paisajes cálidos y fríos,[20] are located at the end of each platform (Cálidos in the northern walls and Fríos in the southern walls);[10] ref 10 doesn't support the content (although the attached pdf might) (2c)
    "and murales en los vestíbulos y las cabeceras de los andenes ... el de la cabecera sur, “Paisajes Cálidos”, y el de la cabecera norte, ”Paisajes Fríos”." -> "and murals in the lobbies and platform headers(?) ... southbound, Warm landscapes, and northbound Cold landscapes--which I wrote backward and now make more geographic sense". I don't know if there's an English word for these walls which are called "cabeceras". © Tbhotch (en-3). 18:34, 18 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • The other two murals, named Tlaltilco (east corridor) and Cuitzeo (west corridor),[10][20] are located in the station corridors.[10] refs don't seem to support that they're locatied within the station corridors (2c)
    Changed to lobby, because it says vestíbulo.
  • Terminal Aérea is briefly mentioned in the Aníbal Ricci book Fear (2007) when the protagonist arrives at the Airport and asks for directions to the city center.[24] Seems trivial (3b)
  • Removed.

Images edit

I don't think the gallery is needed.

  • Removed.

Overall edit

Before I place this on hold, I will request a 2nd opinion for the exit list as well as if this is a reliable source.

Second opinion from Vami IV
  • Robert Schwandl/UrbanRail seems credible to me. UrbanRail is self-published, and that's not good, but its author is a noted publisher on the subject of rail transport. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 05:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @Vami IV: There is a part in the history/construction that I need a 2nd opinion on. Username6892 14:17, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • Aha. This section should not be bullet-points. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 21:19, 25 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @Vami IV: Are you still planning on giving the 2nd opinion? (It's been a week) Username6892 02:33, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • I thought I had given it, but here it is in full: the exits should not be listed, but discussed, and moved into a larger discussion of the terminal layout. –♠Vami_IV†♠ 03:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • If that's the case, i withdraw the nomination. Libraries are closed so I cannot access the Metro's building plan. © Tbhotch (en-3). 04:00, 3 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
  • @Vami IV: I was talking about some confusion I had over spanish to english translation, though given that the nom was withdrawn (I'm not sure whether to mark as failed), it likely won't matter until it is renominated. Username6892 16:35, 4 May 2020 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Move discussion in progress edit

{{User:RMCD bot/multimove|1=Terminal Aérea metro station|2=Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#

headerstylebackground:#CCCCFF;
contentstyleborder:1px #ccf solid; padding:10px;

There is a move discussion in progress on [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains#{{hidden/FC|headerstylebackground:#CCCCFF;|contentstyleborder:1px #ccf solid; padding:10px;|headerArticles|content|Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Trains]] which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 23:05, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply