Talk:Terezin Declaration

Poorly sourced and poorly explained

People who held on to plundered property considered it their own and resented survivors who came back to claim their property. - the statement is true in general, not only about Jewish property. If you claim that Jews were discriminated you have to quote RS.Xx236 (talk) 08:13, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

This is sourced to an academic book - Searching for Justice After the Holocaust: Fulfilling the Terezin Declaration and Immovable Property Restitution, By Michael J. Bazyler, Kathryn Lee Boyd, Kristen L. Nelson, Oxford University Press, 2019, pages xxxiii-xxxvi, written by experts in the field and covering the Terezin Declaration as a topic. Oxford University Press is a reputable publisher. This is not "poorly sourced" - it is as good as a source one can get. Your statement on non-Jewish property may or may not be true, however this is irrelevant as the Terezin Declaration addresses Jews and other target groups (e.g. Roma). Icewhiz (talk) 08:45, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

It's fascinating to learn that Poles weren't a target group. What is a traget group? A group defined by Oxford University? Unfortunately the Nazis didn't know they should spare Poles, especially educated Poles and Catholic clergy.Xx236 (talk) 09:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

As far as I know Holocaust survivors in Communist countries got almost no compensation from Western Germany. Isn't it a problem?Xx236 (talk) 11:36, 21 May 2019 (UTC)

There are plenty of "unfinoished businesses" - Poland and Greece got no compensations from Germany. Poland doesn't have a peace treaty with Germnay. Germnay participates in D-Day anniversaries, Poland doesn't. The majority of German and Austrian criminals weren't punished. Austria doesn't preserve Gusen concentration camp.Xx236 (talk) 11:39, 21 May 2019 (UTC)