Talk:Terence Hallinan

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Jusdafax in topic Political Career Neutrality Dispute

Political Career Neutrality Dispute edit

An anonymous user challenged the neutrality of the Political Career section of this article. The information contained appears sufficiently well cited that most of the claims are at least factually correct but with some obvious exceptions (some quite bold claims are made in this section). In any case, this article may still fail to meet Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy regarding Balance and Neutral Tone. I have noted that the neutrality is disputed. Metajon (talk) 15:10, 10 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • I don't see the bold claims mentioned above. The section appears to be well-referenced, so I am removing the tag. Jusdafax (talk) 00:46, 20 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Request for Comments edit

There is an RfC on the question of using "Religion: None" vs. "Religion: None (atheist)" in the infobox on this and other similar pages.

The RfC is at Template talk:Infobox person#RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

Please help us determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:33, 23 April 2015 (UTC)Reply

Updated ref edit

Sorry for the drive-by edit, but the "Why Kamela Matters" link/ref is old, it's now findable in archives at https://web.archive.org/web/20150321092109/http://www.modernluxury.com:80/san-francisco/story/why-kamala-matters . I don't remember how to format those, so I'm handing it off to a smarter gnome than I. :) Ronabop (talk)