 | A fact from Teraura appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:17, 27 November 2021 (UTC)
( )
Teraura, aged 74 in 1849
- ... that Pitcairn Islander Teraura was one of "the most travelled Polynesian women" of her day? Source: eynolds, Pauline. "The forgotten women of the Bounty and their material heritage." Māori and Pacific Textile Symposium. 2011. https://www.academia.edu/attachments/32837562/download_file?st=MTYzNjM5OTU0Myw5MC4yNTMuMTk2LjU5&s=swp-splash-paper-cover
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Pteronepelys
- Comment: I didn't want to do a sensationalist hook e.g. XX murdered YY
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 19:28, 8 November 2021 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, and mostly well sourced, but thepeerage has been considered unreliable and is deprecated as a source; see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources#Self-published peerage websites. The two footnotes to thepeerage should be replaced with something better. QPQ done. Earwig found no copyvio. Interesting hook, adequately sourced. Image is PD and usable for DYK. Once the thepeerage sourcing issues are fixed, this should be ready for DYK. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:40, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
- David Eppstein, Thanks very much - I hadn't realised the peerage was deprecated, my bad. Will fix it this week and ping you. Lajmmoore (talk) 09:05, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @David Eppstein: - I've removed those references now, and know for future, thanks very much. Lajmmoore (talk) 12:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
Good to go after reference cleanup. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Lajmmoore: is she "travelled" or "well travelled"? can't access the source. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 09:51, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron, the source says "well travelled", but if you think it's clunky we can paraphrase? Lajmmoore (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Lajmmoore: no problem with the hook, but the article says "travelled", not "well travelled", so that should be cleared up. theleekycauldron (talk • contribs) (they/them) 10:03, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- Theleekycauldron, the source says "well travelled", but if you think it's clunky we can paraphrase? Lajmmoore (talk) 10:01, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- *** LOL @ me - I misremembered, thanks for checking! I've changed the hook now. Lajmmoore (talk) 10:05, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
- @David Eppstein: - I've removed those references now, and know for future, thanks very much. Lajmmoore (talk) 12:01, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
