Talk:Temporal parts
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Want to help write or improve articles about Time? Join WikiProject Time or visit the Time Portal for a list of articles that need improving.
—Yamara ✉ 07:49, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
On the relation of temporal parts and events
editI would like something more on the relationship between temporal parts and events. Who identitfied perduring objects with events? And maybe some reference to why perduring objects are not events and why it is wrong to identify objects with events.
--RickardV 10:08, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
Temporary Intrinsics
editThis should either be relocated to the section on perdurantism, or alternatively put into a section on its own. Ideally, one would imagine this page should entirely be about what temporal parts are, as opposed to arguments for their existence (i.e. arguments that perdurantism is true). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.155.7.108 (talk) 23:03, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
- Looks like it got moved into its own section at some point. // ⌘macwhiz (talk) 16:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)