This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
I'm not sure if this is the case, but this article reads suspiciously like a blurb taken from the back cover of the book, not like an article especially created for Wikipedia. Therefore, I have removed all the quoted reviews. That kind of thing may be appropriate for the back cover of a paperback reprint, but not for an encyclopedia. AlbertSM (talk) 01:28, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Again, I have placed a "citation needed" notice at the end of the article for precisely the same reasons. There is no indication given that this entire article is really a book blurb (which it is).AlbertSM (talk) 19:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed, it's a copyvio and inappropriately toned even if it wasn't. I've removed all of it. Wasted Time R (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2009 (UTC)