Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment edit

  This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 April 2019 and 10 June 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mleary24.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Untitled edit

"According to the 2001 census [INDEC], there were 4,300 Tehuelche in the provinces of Chubut and Santa Cruz, and a further 1,637 in other parts of Argentina." -- what?? this is not real, the pure Tehuelche people are virtually extinct !! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.126.93.58 (talk) 22:13, 1 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Broken References edit

Broken references are painfully visible in the article. As I do not have time to fix it, I leave this to somebody who cares. 75.158.39.228 (talk) 21:54, 6 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Requested move edit

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 22:16, 15 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Tehuelche peopleTehuelche — "Tehuelche" is primarily used to refer to the people. The Tehuelche language was only spoken by that people nad is therefore intimely associated with it. Dentren | Talk 16:40, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

  • Not convinced As long as we have two separate articles, we need to disambiguate them. Both stubs work nicely as they are, and anyone typing in the first five letters will have a clear choice. It may be worth it to make Tehuelche redirect here, and have a longer dab page. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 19:43, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. The DAB should stay at the undisambiguated name. Andrewa (talk) 11:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Comment: I also note that there was no heads-up posted at Talk:Tehuelche, which might not have been considered relevant when it was just a two-way DAB but it now has seven entries, none of them redlinks. If this RM is rejected there is no issue, but if relisted a heads-up should be posted (I can't see the move being accepted without relisting). No change of vote. Andrewa (talk) 23:52, 8 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
      • On reflection I've posted the heads-up anyway. Andrewa (talk) 18:55, 10 April 2011 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.