Talk:Tegetthoff class battleship/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: JonCatalán^(Talk) 15:16, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Comments:

• Same deal as the last GA review. If you think any of my edits are incorrect, go ahead and revert them.
• The first paragraph of the construction section is largely uncited. I don't know if the information belongs to cite #8, but if so the reference should be moved to the end of the paragraph.
• I'm not sure about the image gallery, although I'll let that be your call. Maybe a link to commons is better (like your other article).

• The image gallery is used on the Szent Istvan article and I think it looks nice here but if you want it gone, you can remove it. No issues here.--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 23:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

• "...which became a problem as the war gressed..." → I looked up the word "gressed" and could not find a definition.
• Fixed to say Progressed.--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 23:03, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
• "After it was clear that Austria-Hungary had lost World War I, the Austrian government decided to give the ship, along with much of the fleet, to the newly-formed State of Slovenes, Croats and Serbs." → Which ship, this article is on a class?
• I restructured that paragraph, as per above.
• Just out of curiosity, you write that the sinking of the Szent Istvan was filmed. Does this film exist? Is it copyrighted? It would be interesting to have a picture of the ship capsizing.

• A picture does exist of the ship capsizing and the film was sold to the US to assist Austia in the inter-war years. There is a link to it on the Szent Istvan article and I can add it to this one as well if you want.--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 22:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

• Done.--White Shadows ^{Your guess is as good as mine} 23:04, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

• Otherwise, this looks good. JonCatalán^(Talk) 16:09, 6 October 2010 (UTC)