Talk:Teenage Dream

Latest comment: 11 years ago by RMCD bot in topic Move discussion in progress
WikiProject iconDisambiguation
WikiProject iconThis disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.

Untitled edit

This article has been talked about and confirmed about in more that a kazillion places it should be moved! PinkFunhouse13 (talk) 20:15, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

I've requested an evaluation of the incubated version (Wikipedia:Article Incubator/Teenage Dream). —C.Fred (talk) 20:25, 17 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
When is the article going to get moved??? It's good enough!!!! really. PinkFunhouse13 (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
There's disagreement; some editors want to see more independent coverage. See Wikipedia talk:Article Incubator/Teenage Dream. —C.Fred (talk) 18:31, 25 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

aren't Rolling Stone, Billboard and MTV enough sources? it's not like this is an album by some random unknown artist —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mebarack (talkcontribs) 04:42, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

The Rolling Stone link is broken and the Billboard article hardly says anything about the album. The MTV one is more like it. Many of the sources currently used are poor. When the article can be better sourced and when the article can confirm more than just the album's proposed release via those sources, that would be the time to put it back into mainspace. I think it would be worth waiting for one or two more sources.--Michig (talk) 05:56, 30 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
I have fixed the Rolling Stone link and added two additional sources, The Independent and a new article from Rolling Stone. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mebarack (talkcontribs) 08:25, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

MOSDAB - order of entries edit

From WP:MOSDAB: "The primary topic should be placed at the top. In unusual cases, several of the most common meanings may be placed at the top, with other meanings below". The Marc Bolan song that was a fairly major hit and has been covered by several artists since is, I believe, a better choice for the primary topic than an as yet unreleased album by Katy Perry. Even within the albums, the Daniel O'Donnell album was a top 10 hit in the UK, and is surely a better choice than an album that only Katy Perry fans are currently interested in.--Michig (talk) 17:10, 28 July 2010 (UTC) Maybe try reading MOSDAB before reverting in future?--Michig (talk) 17:11, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

About my previous edit. edit

User: Michig, WHY did you revert my previous edit???? I think there is a conflict between that and the one that you reverted. There is no different if I edit like this.

Teenage Dream may refer to:

..........

........

..........

(This preview above may differ from this.) There are few different that I fix it so that it looks clean and clutterless. I JUST FOLLOW THE FORMAT FROM THE OTHER DISAMBIGUATION PAGE LIKE Fearless and One Love.

According to Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(disambiguation_pages)#Introductory_line, it must be:

Teenage Dream may refer to:

and not

Teenage Dream can refer to:

It's okay if you revert the info but I prefer that the blue links must be on top while the unlinked part must be at the bottom of its category. If you have any opinion, fell free to post. Thank you. j3j3j3... pfH0wHz 08:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

I had initially sorted the list so that all songs titled "Teenage Dream" were in one list by artist, whether they had their own articles or not. Now they're grouped by whether the song has an article and then sorted by artist. I think that's a reasonable arrangement. —C.Fred (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Move discussion in progress edit

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Teenage Dream (Katy Perry album) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 17:29, 13 April 2013 (UTC)Reply