Talk:Ted Sundquist

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Demiurge1000 in topic Vandalism??

Question

edit

Did Ted Sundquist write this himself? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.186.130 (talk) 02:09, 17 January 2009 (UTC) No, it was a collaborated revision from his linked in, website, facebook, twitter, his resume, and numerous sited articles written and sited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jillian.Ricard (talkcontribs) 00:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

"improving the flow"

edit

Reverting four different changes made for four different reasons is not "improving the flow". Please explain why each of the changes was reverted? Sergeant Cribb (talk) 19:33, 3 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The changes made were reverted by Ravens, not by myself or lauramparsons. Ravens is incorrect. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jillian.Ricard (talkcontribs) 00:39, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply
This is the reversion I'm referring to, made by Lauramparsons (talk · contribs). Sergeant Cribb (talk) 06:28, 4 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

A book deal.

edit

Apparently, "Sundquist will release his first book June 7, 2013 titled Taking Your Team to the Top: How to Build and Manage Great Teams like the Pros.". Should we include this material in the article, phrased exactly like that? Or not? Opinions welcome. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 03:58, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism??

edit

I don't understand why my page updates keep getting reverted or flagged as vandalism. I greatly improved the look of the infobox and how the references were cited. The only other thing I added was a factual statement: 'Ted is releasing a book'. I also don't understand why that would be seen as either spam, or shameless promotion. It is a fact. Ted is releasing a book. Atiffany (talk) 05:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC) AtiffanyReply

The book is not on sale yet. When the book is on sale, it might be possible to include it in the article; if reliable independent sources discuss it. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 05:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)Reply