Talk:Ted Gup
Latest comment: 10 years ago by 173.81.165.188 in topic Neutral Point Of View
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Neutral Point Of View edit
This article could use one.
"...given that the exposure rendered the $14,000,000 ($123,382,792 by current standards) tax payer funded bunker useless and led to its decommissioning, wasting a facility and requiring another be created, arguably for the ego and career agenda of a single man."
Oh, and Citation Needed. 173.81.165.188 (talk) 07:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)