![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bright green and technogaianism
editCould someone more knowledgeable than me on bright green and technogaianism explain the differences? I tried to do so, but I may very well be wrong.
The difference with bright green is a subtle one. While “bright greenists” are optimistic environmentalists who refuses a manicheistic view on technology and nature, technogaianists seems to adopt a more pragmatic, evolutionist approach. These former may, or not, be considered as utilitarianists.
David Latapie (✒ | @) 10:42, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- Can you cite a source for this statement or this simply your opinion? --Loremaster 19:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)
- I've deleted this sentence from this article since one has been to cite a source for it. --Loremaster 13:55, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
- Cool —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nerdthon123 (talk • contribs) 21:29, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Missing criticism
editSince the similar Bright Green Environmentalism article has an extensive criticism section, I believe Technogaianism should have one as well to balance the article out. Correct me if I'm wrong on this, but the article currently appears to be completely one-sided. Temeku (talk) 01:13, 24 April 2016 (UTC)