Talk:Technocratic views of the Price system

Technocracy Study Course

I have added a link to the Technocracy Study Course, and cleaned up some formating here and syntax. Also added a link to a video about money and its creation. This video is not put out by the Technocracy movement , but it still does a very good job of explaining some money basics (skip sievert 01:54, 24 May 2007 (UTC)) I have also added a bunch of Wiki articles to the page in the SEE ALSO area.(skip sievert 01:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC))

Hibernian (Ross Murphy)

This editor continues to filter all concepts in articles toward Technocracy movement and not Technocracy Incorporated The reason ? Perhaps because he is a member/user of Network of European Technocrats http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_comprofiler&task=userProfile&user=85&Itemid=65 Network of European Technocrats - Ross Murphy

This editor also removes links that would provide a more well rounded presentation of Technate design Technocracy information.

The page Technocracy movement contains directions to get to the Network of European Technocrats page. This editor has removed the link that goes to the originating group that developed the concepts of Technocracy and coined the term price system in this context of the article. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Conflict_of_interest Wikipedia:Conflict of interest -

That site is a for profit site and the Director of that site is Andrew Wallace wikipedia editor Isenhand. A team was formed by NET members and others to control Technocracy and Network of European Technocrats information on wikipedia. http://en.technocracynet.eu/index.php?option=com_fireboard&Itemid=63&func=view&catid=7&id=853#1399 Network of European Technocrats - Re:"War" on Wikipedia over Technocracy I - N.E.T. Forum skip sievert (talk) 16:25, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

History and Purpose of Technocracy by Howard Scott.

http://www.technocracy.org/Archives/History%20&%20Purpose-r.htm History and Purpose of Technocracy

This is a very important link for the information it provides and it is from the official site. The editor removing it and also removing links to Technocracy Incorporated should carefully consider that the article is being deprived without those links as to objective material and overview. skip sievert (talk) 01:46, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Restoring a red link to an article that does not exist

Seems rather pointless...Technocracy Study Course. also to delete Technocracy Incorporated in favor of a movement is not really a good reference. Why make a directive to one article like that when the other edit has both. The original group should not be described connected with a movement skip sievert (talk) 15:12, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I mistakenly put back that link, but I stand by the rest of the edit. --Hibernian (talk) 02:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Added four references and citations

But the article could use more. I added energy accounting, urbanates, etc. skip sievert (talk) 02:15, 23 June 2008 (UTC)