 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled edit
I think this article is a somewhat derogatory form of original research phrase, and it lacks references to say otherwise. If anyone has any references of the use of this term in this fashion, please add them. Andre (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
Take your pick from: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&lr=&q=%22tech+tabloid%22+-wikipedia&btnG=Search particularly: http://videogames.netscape.com/story/2006/08/31/ps3-downgraded-again/ and http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48437-2005Mar18_2.html Thanks for looking so hard for references yourself. --Amaccormack 21:10, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
The part about the Inquirer sounds very childish. It pretty much just a bunch of back and forth name calling. I can't imagine an enclopedia should include articles about what other people have written about it, and then go on about what the encyclopedia wrote regarding the offending party in return. 70.65.6.167 17:15, 2 January 2007 (UTC)