Talk:Te Puke

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hi anyone else who is working on the Te Puke page and happens to look at the discussion page. As you may have noticed, I've made quite a few changes (mostly minor) to the article over the past couple of days. I'm currently planning to add more historical information, more information about Te Puke today, and also to take some photos to add to the article. I've also discovered that much of the article text has been copied from www.tepuke.co.nz. I'm not sure whether or not we're actually permitted to do this (the text isn't, after all, public domain), so I have enquired with the website to see if they're happy about this. If they're not, I will rewrite the article, with the addition of more historical information about the town. Markdarb 21:39, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Oh yes, I also intend to make a section about attractions. Markdarb 21:45, 9 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

The people from the Focus Te Puke website don't seem too worried about their article being put on Wikipedia, so I'll leave it as is for now, although it would still be ideal if the article is rewritten in the future (something I may or may not do). Markdarb 07:07, 15 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic