Talk:Tattoo Parlours Act 2013

Edits of this date

All content in this article was checked against the sources appearing, and any content that did not appear in those sources (unsourced material) now bears an appropriate inline tag. Based on this review of sources, the article appears in large part to be text material drawn directly from the text of the titular Act itself. However, the Act did not appear as a reference (only as an external link), and at one point it was added (to avoid leaving a factual point unsupported). The Act citation, as a primary source, requires violation of WP:OR to interpret and use directly, and so should not simply be added further, cosmetically, to remove tags (and certainly not be added as a presumed source); rather, secondary sources must be found that support each quoted and unsourced statement.

Hence, as of this date, the article appears to stands as a further example of editor {{original research}} through its direct use and interpretation of a primary legislative source, and one that repeatedly violates WP:VERIFY by presenting factual material without stating its sources. Le Prof Leprof 7272 (talk) 14:28, 2 April 2016 (UTC)