Talk:Tariffville, Connecticut

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

Connecticut C‑class Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

merge of historic district

Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

The Tariffville Historic District article has had no local development in over 6 months. Both it and the village article are mostly boiler-plate content. A better reader experience can be had by combining them. A reading of the NRHP nomination form also confirms that the historical significance of the district is identical to the history of the village. --Polaron | Talk 20:44, 13 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

This is one of many article pairs considered in long, mediated discussions; this is one where agreement was to allow/encourage separate development. I disagree that wikipedia is served by merging; here as elsewhere there's benefit to allowing the HD topic develop a more detailed treatment and to encourage numerous photos of its architecture, etc., beyond what is suitable in a town/hamlet/CDP article. A reading of the NRHP nomination document does show it includes a lot of history of the village as background; that is informative but different than the topic of the historic district itself, which is only what you can see today and at NRHP listing date. It's the difference between ancient history in a book vs. a set of artifacts speaking of relatively recent history in a museum. Happily, some development to the articles has happened recently, too. --doncram (talk) 02:22, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Spoonville dam breach

Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

An editor had included a sentence fragment "Home to the great flood that destroyed the dam." I wanted to improve it, so I did a little homework (not enough) and concluded the reference was to the flood of 1955 which breached the Spoonville dam. I think that is what the person meant, but as has been point out, the Spoonville dam, while just downstream from the Tariffville Gorge, is actually in East Granby, not in Tariffville.

I'd like to include the information somewhere, but pending exactly where it belongs and how it should be presented, I've removed it from the article and copied it here:

The Spoonville dam, built in the 19th century, was breached in the flood of 1955, and still remains as a partial dam in 2010, although there are discussions to remove the remaining portion of the dam.^[1]^[2]

--SPhilbrick T 21:01, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

There's always the Farmington River, if there are no other appropriate places to add it to. --Polaron | Talk 22:03, 22 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Done Perfect suggestion, as there are already pics of the broken dam in the article. Thanks. --SPhilbrick T 10:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

^ "Retrofitting for Fish" (PDF). Farmington River News. Winter 09-10. p. 4. Retrieved 22 September 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
^ Buck, Rinker (August 03, 2009). "Giving A Dam About Fish". Hartford Courant. Retrieved 22 September 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

Concert to LDR

Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I converted the refs to LDR style, any questions, just ask.--SPhilbrick T 14:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[Dam_images-1] "Retrofitting for Fish" (PDF). Farmington River News. Winter 09-10. p. 4. Retrieved 22 September 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[Dam_Fish-2] Buck, Rinker (August 03, 2009). "Giving A Dam About Fish". Hartford Courant. Retrieved 22 September 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[1]

[2]