Talk:Tarczyn (company)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (Please tell me what information I o need to add to make this a good article - I added the references with sources so see nothin wrong and it does make sense) --OliwierB (talk) 10:30, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedly deletion cancelled - considerably improved article

You stated the importance In 2012 , Tarczyn was awarded in the category "Juices, Nectars, Drinks" in the "Pearl of the FMCG Market in 2012", organized by Commercial News. . with references which did state importance but ty to add more from websites with always references . Thank you . Reviewer2000 (talk) 11:31, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (OliwierB - added rewards meaning it is important) --Reviewer2000 (talk) 11:32, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (I contest the speedy deletion becuase the article includes informationof importance such as the date of the reward for bes drink so please tell me what I can do to improve it becuase no body ever answers my posts) --OliwierB (talk) 13:00, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

There may be enough to survive a speedy deletion, but the company still appears to fail the WP:CORP notability requirements, so it wouldn't survive WP:AFD. ~Amatulić (talk) 15:55, 21 April 2013 (UTC)